Emilio Nava vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Nava has a slight edge on the second serve performance, winning 47.69% of points compared to Silva's 41.26%.
• In recent return games, Silva outperforms Nava by winning 47.12% of opponent's second serve points versus Nava's 45.76%.
• Silva also leads in first serve return points, achieving 25.87% against Nava's 22.63%.
• Question: Who handles pressure better? Nava saves 56.53% of breakpoints, slightly better than Silva's 52.32%.
• Over the past year, Nava has had a successful 64.37% match win rate, while Silva sits at 55.84%.
• For career surface preferences, both players excel on clay, with Nava winning 67% and Silva 62% of their matches.
• Both players have yet to win a match on grass, but Nava has a slight edge with more attempts.
• Nava competes mostly in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a 69.7% win rate, compared to Silva's 68.18% in Futures/Satellites/ITF.
• In their only head-to-head matchup, Nava claimed victory with a straight-set win at the Concepcion Challenger.
• The average duration of their match was 1:11:26, indicating a relatively quick win for Nava.
• Neither player has experienced a deciding set against each other or a tiebreak, making those future outcomes unpredictable.
• Nava faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 209.36 compared to Silva's 346.43.
• For deciding set performances, Nava has a 58% success rate, outperforming Silva's 47%.
• Silva converts break points more effectively at 32.77%, whereas Nava converts 26.74% of his chances.

Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):

Emilio Nava enters this matchup with a consistent performance edge, particularly in areas like handling pressure and competing against stronger opponents. Despite Silva's superior return stats, Nava's overall match win rate over the past year suggests greater reliability.

Nava’s proficiency on clay and his performance under high-pressure moments like break points serve to further bolster his prospects. Additionally, his proficiency in deciding sets is statistically higher, although head-to-head pressure situations remain unexplored.

Ultimately, while Silva boasts several statistical strengths, Nava’s proven ability to perform against more challenging opponents gives him a considerable advantage.

Based on these factors, Emilio Nava is the likely winner for the upcoming tennis match.